Over the winter, as polar vortices plunged the US Midwest
into weeks of unceasing cold, the icy covers of the Great Lakes started to make
headlines. With almost 96 percent of Lake Superior's 32,000 miles encased in
ice at the season's peak, tens of thousands of tourists flocked to the ice
caves along the Wisconsin shoreline, suddenly accessible after four years of
relatively warmer wintery conditions.
The thing is, all of that ice takes a long time to melt. As
of April 10, 48 percent of the five lakes' 90,000-plus square miles were still
covered in ice, down from a high of 92.2 percent on March 6 (note that
constituted the highest levels recorded since 1979, when ice covered 94.7
percent of the lakes). Last year, only 38.4 percent of the lakes froze over,
while in 2012 just 12.9 percent did–part of a four-year stint of below-average
iciness.
And as the Great Lakes slowly lose their historically large
ice covers over the next few months, the domino effects could include lingering
cold water, delayed seasonal shifts, and huge jumps in water levels.
Already, the impact of this icy blockade can be felt. On
March 25, five days after the official beginning of spring, the Soo Locks
separating Lake Superior from the lower Great Lakes opened for the season. But
after a long and harsh winter, Lake Superior's nearly 32,000 square miles were
still nearly entirely covered in ice. It would be another eleven days before
the first commercial vessel fought its way across Lake Superior–with the aid of
several dedicated ice breakers–and down through the locks.
The trip across Lake Superior to the Soo Locks, which
usually takes 28 hours, took these first ships of the season nine days. A third
ship had to return to Duluth after being damaged by the ice. Detroit District,
US Army Corps of Engineers Facebook
More than 200 million tons of cargo, mostly iron ore, coal,
and grain, travel across the Great Lakes throughout the year. Even a little ice
can make a big dent on this total. Only three shipments of coal were loaded up
during March–69 percent less, by volume, than last year. Shipments of iron ore
from the northern reaches of Minnesota were so low that the US Steel plant in
Gary, Indiana, had to scale back production significantly in early April.
A sluggish start to the shipping season is just one of the cascading
effects of the Midwest's cold and icy winter. Some are good, and will allow the
region to recover from years of historically low water levels. Others, like
this delayed shipping season, less so.
Like the shipping troubles, some of the more unexpected
things the lakes and their ecosystems could face in the next few months are the
direct result of the lingering ice and cold:
Throughout the winter, huge numbers of ducks that feed by
diving below the water for fish ended up starving to death. Connie Adams, a
biologist in New York's Department of Environmental Conservation, told the AP
that the die-off was "unprecedented."
Next in line for concern are a huge number of the Lakes'
fish species. Warming water temperature often biologically triggers migration
to traditional spawning grounds, and experts expect that Northern Pike, lake
sturgeon, steelhead, and rainbow trout could make moves far later this year. As
Shedd Aquarium research scientist Solomon David told Michigan Radio, later egg
laying could mean younger and far weaker fish come next winter, leading to an
even longer impact.
Other changes will come about long after the ice melts, as
water levels are predicted to rebound to levels not seen in the last few years.
Seasonal shifts in water levels, with winter lows and summer highs, are normal.
"If things stayed in sort of a balance, we would see all the lakes water
levels going up and then going down. Every year: up, down; up, down," says
Drew Gronewold, a scientist with NOAA's Great Lakes Environmental Research
Laboratory. But, "when water levels change a lot over time, something is
happening in one of those two parts of the season."
Over the last few years, the summer highs and winter lows
have both been well below their long-term average, as climate change produced
far more rapid rates of evaporation. In December 2012, the Michigan-Huron
system set a new low, breaking a record that had stood since the 1960s,
according to Keith Kompoltowicz, the chief of watershed hydrology for the Army
Corps of Engineers' Detroit District.
6 month forecast
A three-year look at water levels in Lakes Michigan and
Huron, including a six-month forecast, from the US Army Corps of Engineers
Detroit District. The solid red line marks recorded levels, the red vertical
lines a range of six-month projections, and the blue shows the long-term
averages. The black bars indicate record highs and lows. Detroit District, US
Army Corps of Engineers Facebook
Though Kompoltowicz says the usual March and April rise in
water levels is occurring later than usual this year, already the lakes are
seeing water levels that they haven't had for several years. This past March
marked the first time since April of 1998 that Lake Superior had reached its
long-term average. And over the next few months, melting snow will feed the
lakes and colder water could lower the rates of summer and fall evaporation.
The amount of rain could either add to or subtract from this total. The Army
Corps of Engineers and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
generally forecast water levels six months out, and predicted levels for this
September, Kompoltowicz says, range from 10 to 13 inches higher than lake
levels were a year ago.
Here's what higher lake levels could mean:
Shippers may be hurting now, but higher lake levels will
allow them to load more cargo per boat later this year, according to the
Chicago Tribune. These higher water lines also mean that those who manage the
Great Lakes' harbors won't have to invest huge sums of money in dredging out
the bottom. Ships will carry more, at less of a cost, once the ice melts.
Fluctuations in water levels could also help maintain the
diversity of plant and animal species along many coastal wetlands, according to
Kurt Kowalski, a wetland ecologist at the US Geological Survey's Great Lakes
Science Center. Too many years of consistently low water allows certain
species, often non-native plants, to take over.
And even far less large-scale ripple effects will matter.
Scott Stevenson, the executive vice president of the company that manages
Chicago's harbors, told the Tribune that higher water levels will allow them to
rent out 100 expensive slips along the lakefront that shallow water took out of
commission last year.
Though water level changes even over a several year period
are normal, the rebound from record-low water levels is going to be a relief
from the hand-wringing of the last few years. But it will likely be a temporary
one. A hot summer with little precipitation could mute the effects of the icy
winter. And, even if the lakes have more water this year, 2014 could be nothing
more than a blip as climate change continues to wreak havoc. "We don't
know, as this winter really exemplified, what's going to happen,"
Gronewold says. "If we're going to have three more severe winters, or flip
back to three more winters like we've had the past few years."
